Border control
for AI agents.
Independent runtime enforcement and verifiable evidence for AI agents, at the tool boundary.
Every action your agents take crosses a checkpoint: policy check, identity check, then the stamp. Signed, chained, and independently verifiable. The verdict lands before the action does.
Approval fatigue is not governance. Logs you control are not evidence.
of agent permission prompts are approved without reading. Human-in-the-loop decays into rubber-stamping within weeks.
of organizations say their AI agents have already taken actions nobody intended. Some exposed credentials.
for an autonomous agent to breach McKinsey's AI platform. 46.5M messages. 728K files. Machine speed, zero boundaries.
The Report.
Connect read-only. Nothing touches your critical path. Two weeks later you hold what almost no enterprise can produce: every agent action, the verdict policy would have given it, and a seal that proves nobody edited the story.
The red lines do the selling.
Policy in the path. Proof in the chain.
Route agents through SANSAR
SDK in your agent loop, or the MCP gateway at the tool boundary. Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, custom. The vendor's harness stays untouched.
Deterministic verdict, pre-execution
A compiled rules engine resolves every action before it executes. No model in the loop. Zero database calls. Seven sovereignty checks before data moves.
Sealed, signed, verifiable
Every decision is hashed, signed in hardware, and chained to the one before it. Verifying the record never requires trusting our logs.
The action passes, on the record.
A named human decides. The agent waits.
Stopped before it happens.
Its actions stop at the boundary. Under 5ms.
We didn't invent the rules. We enforce the model security has trusted for fifty years.
A reference monitor mediates every action and makes it independently verifiable. It's the established standard for trustworthy enforcement, and SANSAR applies it to AI agents at the tool boundary.
The vendor can't audit the vendor.
Every agent action exits through one boundary you control: the tool call. SANSAR governs it. The reasoning stays in the black box. The actions don't.
Sensitive data does not cross borders by accident.
Seven checks before data moves. Fail one and the transfer never happens. Blocked, not flagged. And the block itself becomes signed evidence.
Not logs. Proof.
Every decision becomes a canonical record. Hashed, signed in hardware, chained to the one before. Tamper anywhere and every later record breaks. Your evidence is exportable, and it outlives us.
The build you approved is the build that acted
The policy you approved is the policy enforced
Proof it's still true, right now
Observe. Shadow. Enforce.
Runtime authority is earned, not installed. Start read-only. Test against live traffic. Switch on enforcement one policy class at a time.
Observe
Record and sign everything. Nothing can break. Auditor-ready from night one.
Shadow
See what would have been denied, escalated, halted. Zero production risk.
Enforce
Verdicts go live, before execution. Kill switch in under 5ms.
Two weeks. One workflow. The Report. Free.
Point SANSAR at one real workflow. Two weeks later you hold signed evidence for every action it took. Your auditor gets an artifact. We get feedback, and if it earns it, a reference.
There is no line item for "runtime authority." There are three for this.
The hard questions, answered plainly.
You're in our critical path. What about latency and failure?+
How is this different from Microsoft Agent 365?+
What happens to our evidence if SANSAR disappears?+
Your agents are already acting. Make it provable.
The free report: signed records for one real workflow, in two weeks.